I am in Central, and all I have witnessed in the last 2 demos is just pure chaos in the name of demos. On 25th, the ''peaceful protestors' were throwing stones at my residence coz I was not joining them. They then went to county commissioner's office where they torched 3 cars. Later, they went to the local supermarket and bakery and looted it dry. One fool was shot dead and few were injured.
Today, they were targeting police station. Police shot one, and one police was badly injured after getting stoned. Had it been restraint, I swear police could have killed many here. The protestors then descended on the next supermarket/wholesale shop and looted it dry. Hii ni nchi gani? Where on earth is this allowed? And dont say anything like ati govt is sponsoring the looters. No. These are the ordinary guys protesting. They did the same to Kagio, Nyeri Naivas, Nanyuki etc. So how is this kind of chaos bringing justice to the departed? How will it help force Ruto out? How will they bring reforms? Who is the loser here? Have you people ever sat down and reflected?
You raise valid concerns, what you've described isn’t the ideal of peaceful protest, and the violence in Central Kenya, from stone-throwing to looting and arson, undoubtedly harms local livelihoods and community trust. But to simply dismiss it as “chaos” misses a deeper pattern. These are the actions of citizens whose avenues for peaceful dissent have been closed by the state.
The government, rather than open dialogue, has chosen to unite Kenyans by playing the ethnic card, blaming the unrest on Kikuyus, insinuating that the violence is driven by one ethnic group to marginalize the rest. That narrative shifts attention away from the root grievances (tax injustice, police brutality, accountability) and inoculates the administration against meaningful compromise.
As for your questions:
Does this chaos bring justice to Albert Ojwang or others killed?
Not directly—but without addressing why some protesters feel they have nowhere else to go, repression only pushes marginalized voices into frustration and desperation. Accountability remains elusive.
How does it force Ruto out or bring reforms?
When protest becomes the only language the government hears, especially after banning media coverage, criminalizing assembly, and deploying live fire, it signals deep failure. Sustained pressure can force at least grudging concessions: meaningful investigations, police reform, repeal of anti-protest laws, but only if the public refuses to be silenced.
Who loses, who gains?
In the short term, those on the frontlines, residents, shopkeepers, protestors, police, are losing lives, property, legitimacy. In the longer view, the winners are those in power who frame dissent as ethnic or criminal and thereby delay dialogue and preserve their control.
In Central, your community suffered real damage, so the anger and fear are justified. But if we step back, the violence is as much a symptom as a cause: a reaction to systematic suppression, a vacuum created by a state unwilling to address concrete demands. Blaming Kikuyus, itself a diversion, is precisely the tactic that keeps the cycle going. Only dialogue, respect for constitutional rights, and honest reckoning with abuses can break it. Otherwise, chaos becomes both the symptom and the strategy of a government that refuses to capitulate or connect.