You can. While at it I would love to here what should have been done differently based on the circumstances.
Example 1
You can. While at it I would love to here what should have been done differently based on the circumstances.
Come on ....Is that what my reply that you partially quoted says?
This is not happening any time soon. The last thing government needs is cutting taxes and reducing the Ordinary Revenue it collects. All it will do is increase the budget deficit.
J for geniusThis is not happening any time soon. The last thing government needs is cutting taxes and reducing the Ordinary Revenue it collects. All it will do is increase the budget deficit.
This is not happening any time soon. The last thing government needs is cutting taxes and reducing the Ordinary Revenue it collects. All it will do is increase the budget deficit.
How does it reduce budgeted corruption?You've forgot to add that it reduces budgeted corruption, something Ruto has perfected compared to other regimes
Kenya to the dogsJ for genius
View attachment 105434
How does it reduce budgeted corruption?
Whoever is behind these economic policies reasons like a school child. Cannot see beyond 1st order effects.This is not happening any time soon. The last thing government needs is cutting taxes and reducing the Ordinary Revenue it collects. All it will do is increase the budget deficit.
Isn't this the first financial year that we are implementing zero-based budgeting? That is a step in the right directions because at the very least it prevents wastage of our meager resources. Couple that with E-Procurement and standardized prices will cut wastage, if it works.Because our budgeting making process uses expenditure first approach so it's easy to budget for corruption. If we used the revenue first approach like majority of OECD countries then budgeted corruption will reduce.
Let me get this right. Government borrowing is a problem. Raising taxes is a problem. Where do you want government to get money to repay loans?Whoever is behind these economic policies reasons like a school child. Cannot see beyond 1st order effects.
In their mind increasing taxes equals increased revenue.
But we're told none of the so called experts drive actual policy, all decisions are made in state house. The positions are merely used to reward allies with govt jobs