Our constitution requires a presidential candidate to get 50%+1 of all valid votes cast in the country.
Let us take a hypothetical case where 51 valid votes are cast. Candidate A gets 25 and candidate B gets 26.
That is 49.0196078431372% and 50.9803921568627% respectively.
Applying the principle of 50%+1, the winning candidate needed 25.5 votes +1=26.5 votes, but since votes can't be halves, then 27.
Question: Would candidate B be considered duly elected as per the 4 dissenting commissioners?