#Justice for Komothai Guards

Aviator

Elder Lister
Am disappointed after watching news that the guards at Komothai Girls have been charged with murdering a boy. When did we start treating heroes as villains and villains as heroes?

Picture this. A gang of six hormone-charged boys sneak into a girls dormitory. They could only have been on one mission- to rape innocent girls. Never mind that they could have been invited by some of the girls. Minors cannot consent to sex, so they were clearly on a rape mission.
Girls raise alarm. The guards, who are entrusted with their safety, respond and deal with them in kind. Then we charge them with murder.

Seriously, shouldn't the police be looking for the 5 rapists who escaped? And shouldn't the BoG of that school give a payrise to the guards for a job well done?

Those who have eaten some salt like me remember a case at St. Kizito. I know a woman who was a victim and she is still traumatized that many years later. Should the guards have looked the other way and let something similar happen? What are guards paid to do? Isn't it to neutralize any security threat?

I wish I was on twirra ningeanza hashtag. Those guards will forever be my heroes.
 
But why is no one talking of the alternative narrative that the whole thing might have been an arranged 'date' that went horribly bad.
Why assume that the boys just decided to go and rape the girls but were caught before commiting the rape.
Methinks there is more to this that just arraigning the poor guards before the court for murder.
 
Wandia Njoya was right when she insists the colonists set up the education system to crush the humanity out of us, first by teaching us to dehumanize ourselves, then separate ourselves from the situations.

So now school going kids are criminals for breaking into a girls school, and their intention was rape. Immediate presumption of guilt on the boys' part, simply because they are boys.

You didn't try to ask whether the girls had actually told the boys to come over. You didn't even try to offer alternative reasons as to why the boys could have crossed over into the school other than attempted rape.

So now, people who are mature enough to sit for exams that will define their lives, are not old enough to consent to sex? Kwani the girls hormones only activate after they've finished their KCSE exams?

This kind of feminism is utter nonsense.
 
Wandia Njoya was right when she insists the colonists set up the education system to crush the humanity out of us, first by teaching us to dehumanize ourselves, then separate ourselves from the situations.

So now school going kids are criminals for breaking into a girls school, and their intention was rape. Immediate presumption of guilt on the boys' part, simply because they are boys.

You didn't try to ask whether the girls had actually told the boys to come over. You didn't even try to offer alternative reasons as to why the boys could have crossed over into the school other than attempted rape.

So now, people who are mature enough to sit for exams that will define their lives, are not old enough to consent to sex? Kwani the girls hormones only activate after they've finished their KCSE exams?

This kind of feminism is utter nonsense.
History teaches us that when boys in a school setting let their hormones rule, disaster follows.

 
History teaches us that when boys in a school setting let their hormones rule, disaster follows.

How does what happened at St. Kizito connect with the six boys?

Does the St. Kizito massacre now mean every school going male is a criminal and should be treated as such?

Had the boys gone to mete revenge on the girls for something they were supposed to do together?

What informs your idea that every time a boy breaks into a girls school, they are going to commit rape?
 
What else would they be going to do? Its common sense.
@JazzMan kwani they were going to sing a lullaby to the sleeping girls?
Right there. Why should they illegally be where they shouldn't be ?
This is the exact presumption of guilt I'm talking about. The boys could have been acting on a dare. Go steal something from the ladies.

If it is true the boys were going to have sex, then they have accomplices on the girls' side. There is no way those boys could have done something that risky if they hadn't been promised some. So rather than label the boys criminals, also weed out the accomplices among the girls.
 
This is the exact presumption of guilt I'm talking about. The boys could have been acting on a dare. Go steal something from the ladies.

If it is true the boys were going to have sex, then they have accomplices on the girls' side. There is no way those boys could have done something that risky if they hadn't been promised some. So rather than label the boys criminals, also weed out the accomplices among the girls.
You have rationalized stupidity.
 
Am not sure, but what I know is that if someone tries that with my daughter, he would be dead twice, irrespective of his age.
That will not be rape but consentual sex between minors in which case both parties are equally liable. Bottom line no minor girl or boy should be killed under such circumstances of youthfull foolishness. They can get sent to reformed schools but murder is way over the line. I hope these guards get the maximum sentense.
 
Back
Top