Not all parastatals are companies. You need to understand what a company is and what a state corporation is. Not all parastatals are profit making entities that is why IPSAS was developed as an alternative to IFRS..read on it. China model is not really the best model since businesses are managed as per govt wishes. Singapore model is much better since the govt would get highly qualified executives who had studied and worked abroad to establish companies with the caveat that if it fails it winds up no bail out.Parastatals are government companies they are there to provide essential services and they should be profitable if well managed and they would help reduced the tax burden on citizens,think of safaricom if it was wholly government owned.
Tha'ts how the Chinese govt makes money with china engineering et al
A state corporation is a company, owned by the state the operative word here is corporation.Not all parastatals are companies. You need to understand what a company is and what a state corporation is. Not all parastatals are profit making entities that is why IPSAS was developed as an alternative to IFRS..read on it. China model is not really the best model since businesses are managed as per govt wishes. Singapore model is much better since the govt would get highly qualified executives who had studied and worked abroad to establish companies with the caveat that if it fails it winds up no bail out.
No sir. Allow me to to disagree with your assertion. IPSAS is applied by Non Profit making entities including international entities such as the UNA state corporation is a company, owned by the state the operative word here is corporation.
IPSAS AND IFRS are accounting standards but it doesn't take away from the fact that the companies are owned by the state and ought to be profitable and over breaking even.