Ferk the 🚨

This is the most credible version since it is supported by multiple events, especially by the prisoners who executed the torture.

Most crimes have all the three risk factors present.

Motive- What would be the motive of the prisoners beating someone they have just met?

Means- What did the prisoners use? Rungus or just their own hands? Did they tie Ojwang’s hands so that he was immobilized? Do they have skills of torture?

Once you analyze the above you will know that story ni ya jaba.

Then the OB shows that Ojwang left the station. Where he went to is the lead we should be following

IMG_1587.webp
 
Most crimes have all the three risk factors present.

Motive- What would be the motive of the prisoners beating someone they have just met?

Means- What did the prisoners use? Rungus or just their own hands? Did they tie Ojwang’s hands so that he was immobilized? Do they have skills of torture?

Once you analyze the above you will know that story ni ya jaba.

Then the OB shows that Ojwang left the station. Where he went to is the lead we should be following

View attachment 106683
Motive - Money and release from prison
Means - They are criminals already, so they are tools
Opportunity - They were the best placed since they were prisoners already.

*** The blunder they did was to place Albert in a separate room, indicating they had planned for something. Usually, when police want to punish a prisoner, they will secretly contract fellow prisoners to do it, and the whole thing is registered as fighting or violence within the cells. This a common and widespread practice. If they had done that, it would have been impossible to prove foul play.
 
Motive - Money and release from prison
Means - They are criminals already, so they are tools
Opportunity - They were the best placed since they were prisoners already.

*** The blunder they did was to place Albert in a separate room, indicating they had planned for something. Usually, when police want to punish a prisoner, they will secretly contract fellow prisoners to do it, and the whole thing is registered as fighting or violence within the cells. This a common and widespread practice. If they had done that, it would have been impossible to prove foul play.

Why then did the CCTV disappear if its prisoners who did the killing? You guys are believing a very false narrative. That statement will be trashed in court.
 
Why then did the CCTV disappear if its prisoners who did the killing? You guys are believing a very false narrative. That statement will be trashed in court.
Most likely to hide those who were coordinating the whole thing. Most likely it was not Mukhwana alone. A scenario is more plausible when it can be verified from multiple sources.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top