Digitalization: Uhuru's most overlooked achievement.

you want the likes of google and ali baba to continue minting millions without paying taxes?

We have to live with digital taxes. Brick and mortar stores are collapsing because of increased competition from online stores. There are also new forms of services that are entirely digital. Digital economy is now too big to go without taxation.
 
Mandarins in county governments don't want to automate some functions because it will close conduits through which they steal money. THey have all been connected to the National Optic Fibre Backbone infrastructure (NOFBI) cable by the way so they have no excuse not to automate.

That's partly true, the stealing part. Connection to fibre backbone is a good starting point. However to automate you need expensive hardware, software and personel. They could pool resources and create a goverment cloud and have each county pay per use.
 
What European OECD Countries Are Doing about Digital Services Taxes
March 25, 2021
Asen-150x150.png

Elke Asen

Over the last few years, concerns have been raised that the existing international tax system does not properly capture the digitalization of the economy. Under current international tax rules, multinationals generally pay corporate income tax where production occurs rather than where consumers or, specifically for the digital sector, users are located. However, some argue that through the digital economy, businesses (implicitly) derive income from users abroad but, without a physical presence, are not subject to corporate income tax in that foreign country.
To address these concerns, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has been hosting negotiations with more than 130 countries to adapt the international tax system. The current proposal would require multinational businesses to pay some of their income taxes where their consumers or users are located. According to the OECD, an agreement is expected midyear.
However, despite these ongoing multilateral negotiations, several countries have decided to move ahead with unilateral measures to tax the digital economy. About half of all European OECD countries have either announced, proposed, or implemented a digital services tax (DST), which is a tax on selected gross revenue streams of large digital companies. Because these taxes mainly impact U.S. companies and are thus perceived as discriminatory, the United States has responded with retaliatory threats.
Digital tax Europe Digital taxes in Europe Digital services tax Europe Digital services taxes in Europe 2021
As of Tuesday, Austria, France, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Spain, Turkey, and the United Kingdom have implemented a DST. Belgium, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia have published proposals to enact a DST, and Latvia, Norway, and Slovenia have either officially announced or shown intentions to implement such a tax.
The proposed and implemented DSTs differ significantly in their structure. For example, while Austria and Hungary only tax revenues from online advertising, France’s tax base is much broader, including revenues from the provision of a digital interface, targeted advertising, and the transmission of data collected about users for advertising purposes. The tax rates range from 1.5 percent in Poland to 7.5 percent in both Hungary and Turkey (although Hungary’s tax rate is temporarily reduced to 0 percent).
Although these DSTs are generally considered to be interim measures until an agreement is reached at the OECD level, it is unclear whether all will be repealed at that point. In addition, the European Union (EU) intends to implement its own digital levy from 2023 onwards, with a bill outlining the details expected midyear. At the same time, the United Nations (UN) is considering adding special provisions for income from automated digital services to the UN Model Tax Convention (see Article 12B), which would apply to treaty parties who agree to its inclusion.
 
What European OECD Countries Are Doing about Digital Services Taxes
March 25, 2021
Asen-150x150.png

Elke Asen

Over the last few years, concerns have been raised that the existing international tax system does not properly capture the digitalization of the economy. Under current international tax rules, multinationals generally pay corporate income tax where production occurs rather than where consumers or, specifically for the digital sector, users are located. However, some argue that through the digital economy, businesses (implicitly) derive income from users abroad but, without a physical presence, are not subject to corporate income tax in that foreign country.
To address these concerns, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has been hosting negotiations with more than 130 countries to adapt the international tax system. The current proposal would require multinational businesses to pay some of their income taxes where their consumers or users are located. According to the OECD, an agreement is expected midyear.
However, despite these ongoing multilateral negotiations, several countries have decided to move ahead with unilateral measures to tax the digital economy. About half of all European OECD countries have either announced, proposed, or implemented a digital services tax (DST), which is a tax on selected gross revenue streams of large digital companies. Because these taxes mainly impact U.S. companies and are thus perceived as discriminatory, the United States has responded with retaliatory threats.
Digital tax Europe Digital taxes in Europe Digital services tax Europe Digital services taxes in Europe 2021
As of Tuesday, Austria, France, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Spain, Turkey, and the United Kingdom have implemented a DST. Belgium, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia have published proposals to enact a DST, and Latvia, Norway, and Slovenia have either officially announced or shown intentions to implement such a tax.
The proposed and implemented DSTs differ significantly in their structure. For example, while Austria and Hungary only tax revenues from online advertising, France’s tax base is much broader, including revenues from the provision of a digital interface, targeted advertising, and the transmission of data collected about users for advertising purposes. The tax rates range from 1.5 percent in Poland to 7.5 percent in both Hungary and Turkey (although Hungary’s tax rate is temporarily reduced to 0 percent).
Although these DSTs are generally considered to be interim measures until an agreement is reached at the OECD level, it is unclear whether all will be repealed at that point. In addition, the European Union (EU) intends to implement its own digital levy from 2023 onwards, with a bill outlining the details expected midyear. At the same time, the United Nations (UN) is considering adding special provisions for income from automated digital services to the UN Model Tax Convention (see Article 12B), which would apply to treaty parties who agree to its inclusion.
about time, . but kiulizo tu apart from tax that was introduced the other day, do a company like Netflix that offer no physical goods to kenya pay corporate tax from business generated from Kenyans? I doubt if they've any physical office in kenya
 
about time, . but kiulizo tu apart from tax that was introduced the other day, do a company like Netflix that offer no physical goods to kenya pay corporate tax from business generated from Kenyans? I doubt if they've any physical office in kenya
They should. I guess the same way ISPs are able to isolate pirated signals is the same way they can quantify traffic for purposes of taxation.
 
Ask me about it! And the queues combined with the covid situation don't help. Same hall that services birth certificates also does those for death. Out of the 20 or so booths, half of them are usually empty. I don't like making a fuss out of nothing but those guys made an error on Mzeiya Jr's birth certificate TWICE! And it's not like he has a sophisticated name.

Anyway, there are some gains and more still to do.

I appreciate how streamlined NTSA now is as well as the fact that if one renews their passport, it now gets delivered by carrier services.

But I can't forgive this gava for the taxation that they're now leveraging on the digital space. It will undo so much good.
If taxation means faster service affordably,I am all for it. I know some of you did experience thenmanual service delivery of yester years,before automationa and HCs. Anyone who wants to go back just because he has been asked to pay a token amount ofmust be sick in the head.
 
Last edited:
The past years we have seen the greatest digitalisation in the republic i believe you can pretty much do self service for 80% of governmet services. I recently had to get the smart DL and am totally impressed with the whole thing, i booked a precise appointment through NTSA ,Showed up at my prefered biometrics capture centre and am only asked for identification. The rest of the data they already have it.The whole thing took 5 minutes and am told to collect the physical smart DL in 3 weeks. I check the NTSA portal and my DL is already showing validity. That is ome serious sophistication. Whoever did the procurement for goverment systems did an excellent job , not even Sillicon valley with their famous IT power don't enjoy such service. Anyone familiar with the American DMV knows its a full day affair. Have to give credit where it's due. What government service have you been immensely impressed with?
My only issue with digitalisation is that everything is online, it can be hacked easily, DMV on the other hand is an intranet, system they have to input the data manually into their system.
 
Back
Top