The fact that they oppose it is enough reason to believe that they are complicit.A stay order is temporary, lawyers haven't won yet and if they do consider the strength of their argument.
such orders, lawyers like grand mullah loves them, they'll keep renewing it like fuliza.OR they are doing clean up now and don't want to raise flagsA stay order is temporary, lawyers haven't won yet and if they do consider the strength of their argument.
Stay orders are a commonsense move regardless of the beneficiary, it wouldnt make sense having a matter under determination while a law whose legality could be overturned by the court is enforced, it would be chaos.such orders, lawyers like grand mullah loves them, they'll keep renewing it like fuliza.OR they are doing clean up now and don't want to raise flags
But nikama doctors seeking stay orders against reporting gunshot wounds to cops claiming doctor-patient confidentiality.
I am no lawyer so I wont address the merits of the case, my only concern is this misconception of stay orders, it has become a running theme to use them as evidence that the Judiciary is anti-executive yet they are issued against all and sundry including private firms.The fact that they oppose it is enough reason to believe that they are complicit.
sometimes they're unnecessary for the greater good. Some time back there was someone who was allowed temporarily to access their offices which was said to contain incriminating evidence. They cited human rights etc but the moment they were allowed, all evidence was lost. Can't remember the exact details.People need to calm down, stay orders are issued in the very early stages of a suit, they are not an indicator of who is going to win or lose.
Why are they opposing it? That is to me incriminating them in the whole dark world of money laundering.I am no lawyer so I wont address the merits of the case, my only concern is this misconception of stay orders, it has become a running theme to use them as evidence that the Judiciary is anti-executive yet they are issued against all and sundry including private firms.
People need to calm down, stay orders are issued in the very early stages of a suit, they are not an indicator of who is going to win or lose.
JSC as currently constituted will ensure there is no progress whenever a new law/court proceeding threatens dirty deals by lawyers/judges. Judges will rule in whatever way and JSC won't do jackWacha niulize tena - who elected these wig-wearing clowns to run out country....
Ule chairman wa National Lands CommissionSome time back there was someone who was allowed temporarily to access their offices which was said to contain incriminating evidence. They cited human rights etc but the moment they were allowed, all evidence was lost. Can't remember the exact details.
Kwani wakenya ni maji gani hio mnakunywa inawafanya mkuwe wajinga hivyo? Sii watu waache mehemehe watuwekee the pleadings hapa. I refuse to imagine that there are judges hellbent on issuing orders without looking at the merits of the orders sought.
Naomba pleadings wewe unaniwekea ile kitu ya kufunga nyama. Anyway, even from the meat wrappers, it appears the learned judge addressed himself to issues raised before him and did not pull orders from his ass as you wanted us to believe. Ama wewe unaelewa aje mambo ya prejudice?Justice James Makau issued the order following a request by Nairobi-based lawyer Omwanza Ombati, who argued that the amendments introduced in the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering (Amendment) Act by the National Assembly are harmful to practising advocates.
“Implementation of section 2(c) and section 14 (b) of the amended Act makes the advocates and their employees, who are not advocates, including accountants, clerks and cleaners, as reporting agents of the Financial Reporting Centre (FRC). Offices of advocates have been made junked police station,” said Mr Ombati.
In granting the temporary order, Justice Makau said Mr Ombati had demonstrated that advocates stand to suffer prejudice if the amendments, which came into force on January 3, 2022, are enforced.
“Pending the hearing, a conservatory order is hereby issued stopping any further implementation of section 2(c) and section 14 (b) of the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-money Laundering Amendment Act (2021) as regards to the advocates and their staff,” the judge ordered.
Dirty cash: Court stops lawyers from disclosing deals
The High Court temporarily suspended the implementation of a section of the law that compels lawyers’ to report suspicious financial deals involving their clients.www.businessdailyafrica.com