Well put. This is done in heterosexual couples as well. Why cant it be done for homosexual couples as well?
I do not think africans would take kindly to children raised by homosexuals because of the mindset you are presenting.
It can't be done as homosexual couples are not normal. No matter how many times you try to push it down our throats, it is very unnatural.
Yes, I love my African mindset. It means I cannot be easily exploited by the imperialists as you have.
If anything homosexuals would be encouraging of tolerance considering the hardships they endure. Which I think is something to be encouraged not disparaged.
The same kind of tolerance they are showing Dave Chapelle at the moment? The same kind of tolerance shown to Da Baby? Is that the kind of nonsense you want imported here?
your definition of natural relationship is what lead to the conclusion.
Your definition was "A natural relationship is between a man and a woman, where they have the right sexual reproductive plumbing to raise a family and propagate a society."
You have said there are two requirements needed. Failure of one or both of those requirements would disqualify the couple as per your definition.
The most important part of my definition is the relationship between a man and a woman. The failure of a normal couple to conceive does not negate the fact that they have the right conditions to raise a family. The woman can still give care, and the man can still provide. Even then it could simply be a case of medical treatments, or intervention to get the normal couple to start a family without needing to adopt someone else's child.
That is the natural order of things, unlike your homos whose only agenda is to propagate their nonsense onto some other people's children as they cannot have their own without adopting, or getting help from a miscreant of the opposite sex.
If it was natural, then the women could fertilise each other and men would give birth.
i brought up the greeks because you mentioned About how a society cannot thrive with homosexual tendancies..the greeks didnt die out coz of this. Not if i recall my history correctly. The rise of other powers both in military, naval and even economic might did.
The Greeks and Romans died out because of moral decadence. They had built their societies to a level where the elites would want for nothing, and so to have new experiences, they decided to sodomise each other. What happened after was a crumbling of their societies to the point enemies could take advantage of their weaknesses and destroy them.
Now it is the west's turn to be destroyed by a new rising power. You can participate in their moral decadence by yourself, but don't expect the rest of us to legitimise it or tolerate it.
How does it affect you?
