Hydroxychloroquine, zinc, Zethromax and fake doctors

The.Black.Templar

Elder Lister
Staff member
the only journal retracted was the Lancet Journal. State any other retracted hapa
Any other source apart from the lancet journal would be questioned, infact all other reports were based of that research.
Unfortunately all decisions being made are based on the Lancet journal including WHO.
 

AU5

Administrator
Staff member
Any other source apart from the lancet journal would be questioned, infact all other reports were based of that research.
Unfortunately all decisions being made are based on the Lancet journal including WHO.

πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚

Enyewe hujui kudanganya. NI wapi in the other journals iliandikwa that they based their research on the Lancet journal? Kwani oxford pia based their on the Lancet journal?
 

The.Black.Templar

Elder Lister
Staff member

AU5

Administrator
Staff member

That one paper did alot more damage than the oxford could have ever done

LOL, umekwamilia hii paper moja yet there are countless other papers that proved that the drug is ineffective.

Trump kwanza ako na shares in Sanofi which makes that drug. So when idiots like you promote it mnamsaidia kuunda pesa
 

The.Black.Templar

Elder Lister
Staff member
LOL, umekwamilia hii paper moja yet there are countless other papers that proved that the drug is ineffective.

Trump kwanza ako na shares in Sanofi which makes that drug. So when idiots like you promote it mnamsaidia kuunda pesa
Kama ni matusi, you can insult all you want if it makes you feel better. If there are countless other studies, then why would they need to fabricate data? while india is expanding the drugs use https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01619-8 others are busy rectracting their studies

Two weeks after a high-profile paper in The Lancet1 reported that the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine might be dangerous to patients with COVID-19, three of its four authors have retracted the work because they were unable to independently verify their data set, a large proprietary collection of electronic health records analysed by Surgisphere, a US company.

On the same day, 4 June, the researchers and other co-authors retracted a paper in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM)2, for the same reason. That study, published a month ago, had looked at the impact of certain heart medications on people with COVID-19, and found no safety concerns.

A third study authored by Desai, Mehra and others that used Surgisphere data, which claimed to find a large reduction in COVID-19 mortality when patients were given the anti-parasitic drug ivermectin, has disappeared from the social-sciences preprint server SSRN, where it was first posted on 6 April; a second version was posted on 19 April. Mehra told Nature that he removed the study because he "did not feel it was ready for peer review".
 

bigDog

Elder Lister
Kama ni matusi, you can insult all you want if it makes you feel better. If there are countless other studies, then why would they need to fabricate data? while india is expanding the drugs use https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01619-8 others are busy rectracting their studies

Two weeks after a high-profile paper in The Lancet1 reported that the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine might be dangerous to patients with COVID-19, three of its four authors have retracted the work because they were unable to independently verify their data set, a large proprietary collection of electronic health records analysed by Surgisphere, a US company.

On the same day, 4 June, the researchers and other co-authors retracted a paper in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM)2, for the same reason. That study, published a month ago, had looked at the impact of certain heart medications on people with COVID-19, and found no safety concerns.

A third study authored by Desai, Mehra and others that used Surgisphere data, which claimed to find a large reduction in COVID-19 mortality when patients were given the anti-parasitic drug ivermectin, has disappeared from the social-sciences preprint server SSRN, where it was first posted on 6 April; a second version was posted on 19 April. Mehra told Nature that he removed the study because he "did not feel it was ready for peer review".
Post a paper here that supports your assertion that hydroxycholoroquine cures covid-19 disease. Not a video, not a news item. Post a peer reviewed paper from an established publisher.
 
Top