Field Marshal
Elder Lister
Classic whataboutism.Deflecting again are we?
PS: How did the Mkisii Msoto @JazzMan use this term just as I thought of it? Creepy!
Classic whataboutism.Deflecting again are we?
Deflecting how? You say we've become gullible, eating what 'propagandists' are feeding us yet we've seen these things happen? Don't feign amnesia. You want me to post multiple links of EACC intimidation because of political inclinations?Deflecting again are we?
Bro, what's that got to do WITH THE TIME LINES IN WHICH THE EACC RESPONDS TO ALLEGATIONS ABOUT ITSELF?Deflecting how? You say we've become gullible, eating what 'propagandists' are feeding us yet we've seen these things happen? Don't feign amnesia. You want me to post multiple links of EACC intimidation because of political inclinations?
Absolutely nothing. Where have I commented on timelines? I was just pointing out the political tangent that EACC has taken based on its action in the recent past. We see these things, we're not blind. When we passed the 2010 constitution hakukua na upuus kama huu.Bro, what's that got to do WITH THE TIME LINES IN WHICH THE EACC RESPONDS TO ALLEGATIONS ABOUT ITSELF?
What I have been telling you in simple terms is that you cannot judge Otieno's thieving by saying that Mwangi is also a thief. Each of their cases should be on its own merit.Deflecting how? You say we've become gullible, eating what 'propagandists' are feeding us yet we've seen these things happen? Don't feign amnesia. You want me to post multiple links of EACC intimidation because of political inclinations?
Boss, go back to the post we were responding to. IT'S ABOUT THE TIME LINES THE EACC TOOK TO RESPOND TO SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS. It's not about salaries at EACC for example, or what they have for afternoon tea. IT'S ABOUT TIME LINES. It is you who has introduced certain tangential issues about the same organisation - its alleged misuse by the executive - and now expect us to answer them. This is called whataboutism sir. Check up the word.Absolutely nothing. Where have I commented on timelines? I was just pointing out the political tangent that EACC has taken based on its action in the recent past. We see these things, we're not blind. When we passed the 2010 constitution hakukua na upuus kama huu.
Again I'm asking why the intimidation and bribery with this ruBBIsh?
Now this is deflecting. You were talking about a fake report of Khaminwa being visited by EACC. You called it propaganda and that we've become too gullible.How are people gullible yet they've seen these things happen in the recent past to believe otherwise?What I have been telling you in simple terms is that you cannot judge Otieno's thieving by saying that Mwangi is also a thief. Each of their cases should be on its own merit.
Spare the links for they don't change the fact that yesterday's was a skunk, a stinker.
Tulia Guka, then carefully read the OP's post again if at all you had read it in the first place. Then you tell me where timelines were mentioned.Boss, go back to the post we were responding to. IT'S ABOUT THE TIME LINES THE EACC TOOK TO RESPOND TO SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS. It's not about salaries at EACC for example, or what they have for afternoon tea. IT'S ABOUT TIME LINES. It is you who has introduced certain tangential issues about the same organisation - its alleged misuse by the executive - and now expect us to answer them. This is called whataboutism sir. Check up the word.