mzeiya
Elder Lister
In a country where nearly every household battles with the cost of living, the revelation by Kenya’s Parliamentary Budget Office that Kenyans pay an average of USD 0.26 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) for residential electricity is both disturbing and damning. This figure makes Kenya’s electricity the most expensive in Africa and significantly higher than that of its regional peers. When compared to Uganda (USD 0.17), Tanzania (USD 0.09), South Africa (USD 0.12), and Ethiopia (USD 0.006), the scale of disparity becomes unforgivable. It is not merely a pricing issue; it is a policy failure, a structural economic handicap, and a betrayal of the Kenyan citizen by those tasked with delivering affordable energy.
This level of pricing translates to Kenyans paying 53% more than Ugandans, 189% more than Tanzanians, 117% more than South Africans, and an outrageous 4,233% more than Ethiopians. At these margins, the question isn’t whether Kenya has a power problem—it is why we continue to tolerate it. Energy, once regarded as the engine of development, has been weaponized against the very people it should empower. This reality means that even middle-income families are turning to candles, kerosene, and charcoal stoves—not for lack of modernity, but due to a pricing regime that borders on economic sabotage.
To understand the gravity of Kenya’s electricity costs, we must examine the economic consequences. High electricity prices increase the cost of doing business, reduce competitiveness, and discourage industrialization. Manufacturing firms, small and medium enterprises, and digital startups all operate on slim margins. Every additional cent spent on electricity is a cent taken from salaries, innovation, expansion, or even staying afloat. Kenya’s vision of becoming a manufacturing hub or a Silicon Savannah becomes a hollow dream when it is cheaper to operate a factory in Ethiopia or run a data center in South Africa.
Moreover, households have not been spared. For the average Kenyan family earning less than USD 200 a month, spending USD 20-30 on electricity is unsustainable. It eats into food budgets, school fees, rent, and healthcare. Worse still, these high bills are often accompanied by unreliable supply, frequent blackouts, and inflated charges such as fuel cost adjustments and forex levies—ironically making the power both expensive and of poor quality. It is a cruel irony: Kenya has abundant renewable energy sources—hydro, wind, and geothermal—yet the benefits never trickle down to the consumer.
So why is electricity so expensive in Kenya? A significant factor is the structure of Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs), many of which are signed in hard currency with independent power producers (IPPs). These contracts lock the country into long-term deals that demand payments whether or not power is consumed. Worse, they are tied to the dollar, meaning every depreciation of the Kenyan shilling sends electricity prices soaring. The government’s poor negotiation skills, lack of transparency, and political patronage have created a cartel-like system that punishes consumers while enriching a few.
Let us expand the analysis beyond East Africa. According to World Bank and IEA data, countries like Egypt (USD 0.03), Morocco (USD 0.12), Nigeria (USD 0.10), Ghana (USD 0.13), and Algeria (USD 0.04) all provide cheaper electricity than Kenya. Even war-torn Sudan manages an average rate of about USD 0.06. Countries with much lower GDP per capita, such as Zambia, Malawi, or Mozambique, manage to subsidize power or structure their energy systems to protect consumers. Kenya, on the other hand, remains fixated on liberalized pricing in a market rigged against the people.
In comparing Kenya to 20 additional economies across Africa and beyond—Rwanda (USD 0.10), Senegal (USD 0.12), Tunisia (USD 0.08), Namibia (USD 0.09), DRC (USD 0.07), Cameroon (USD 0.11), Sierra Leone (USD 0.14), Liberia (USD 0.13), Lesotho (USD 0.10), Zimbabwe (USD 0.09), India (USD 0.08), Bangladesh (USD 0.07), Indonesia (USD 0.10), Vietnam (USD 0.08), Pakistan (USD 0.09), Philippines (USD 0.13), Brazil (USD 0.12), Mexico (USD 0.11), Turkey (USD 0.15), and Malaysia (USD 0.10)—the picture becomes clearer: Kenya is an anomaly. A country overburdening its citizens with a critical utility.
The knock-on effects are visible everywhere. Schools are unable to run ICT labs, hospitals face power rationing, and county governments can’t sustain lighting for basic services. The poor suffer the most: slum dwellers often rely on illegal connections or shared meters that drive up costs even further. Small kiosks pay exorbitantly for the luxury of lighting a bulb or running a fridge. High power bills directly translate to inflation, as businesses pass on their operational costs to consumers, raising prices of goods and services across the board.
The dream of electric mobility is also throttled by these high costs. Why would anyone invest in EVs when charging is more expensive than fueling a petrol car? Similarly, Kenyans are being discouraged from using electricity for cooking, instead reverting to charcoal and gas. This not only undermines clean energy goals but also accelerates deforestation, health risks from indoor pollution, and environmental degradation.
Kenya’s expensive electricity is a tax on hope. Every young person with a startup idea must weigh whether they can afford to operate in Nairobi’s overpriced grid. Every farmer using cold storage or irrigation systems must calculate whether the returns will cover power bills. This high cost erodes innovation, drives capital flight, and promotes a survivalist rather than visionary economy.
From a macroeconomic perspective, Kenya is losing competitiveness on the continental stage. Investors now prefer Ethiopia, Rwanda, and Egypt—not just for their policy environments but for their lower cost of power. The Kenya Investment Authority may pitch Nairobi as a destination for business, but these prices betray the pitch. They reflect not a pro-business nation, but a country where inefficiency is embedded in the utility ecosystem.
International donors and development partners are watching closely. They fund rural electrification programs only to see the beneficiaries unable to pay for usage. Kenya Power, despite its monopoly, is financially struggling—its debts mounting even as it charges the highest rates. This points to mismanagement, political interference, and poor corporate governance, not a reflection of actual input costs.
At the heart of this crisis is a lack of accountability. Parliamentarians raise the alarm only when the outrage is too loud to ignore. Regulatory authorities like the Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (EPRA) seem complicit, often approving hikes with minimal public consultation. The Ministry of Energy hides behind technical jargon while doing little to protect the consumer from the burden of dollarized PPAs and systemic inefficiencies.
The idea that Kenya must pay a premium because of renewable energy investments is a myth. Countries like Costa Rica, Iceland, and Norway run entirely or largely on renewables, yet their electricity prices remain affordable due to better planning, transparency, and local capacity. Kenya’s renewable boom should have been a blessing, but it has become a business racket, with the public footing the bill.
There is a human cost too—stories of families rationing electricity, of students studying under dim lights, of clinics unable to operate life-saving machines. Power should be a right, not a luxury. The current system punishes the aspirational, the entrepreneurial, the weak, and the young. It undermines the very essence of development: opportunity.
The solution requires a radical overhaul. Renegotiate PPAs. Subsidize low-income users. Decentralized generation. Improve grid efficiency. Unbundle transmission and distribution for accountability. Punish cartels and recover looted assets. Most of all, put the Kenyan consumer at the center of energy planning, not as a revenue stream but as a stakeholder in the nation’s growth.
Kenya’s exorbitant electricity pricing is not an accident—it is a symptom of greed, inertia, and failed governance. If power is the lifeblood of development, then Kenya is suffering a chronic hemorrhage. Unless addressed, this energy crisis will continue to hollow out our economy, frustrate our ambitions, and burden our people. The light at the end of the tunnel will remain just that—a distant flicker, too expensive to reach.
Author
