After Much Head Scratching, Safaricom's Answer To Space X

shocks

shocks

Elder Lister
20240823_212936.jpg
 
shocks said:
I'd like to hear about this arguement further, does spaceX pay for spectrum at telco rates as its the only point in that letter. But all in, safcom has a competitor, competitors in future since the chinkus will be lauching a competitor soon.
Click to expand...

Good point, I will research.

What is happening now is that those guys wamestuka.... Which is good anyway. A healthy competition is always welcomed.

Acha Katambe bro.
 
That dwarf cannot run even a village kiosk he is so profit centered rather than innovating we have literally Seen the green giant deteriorating under our very own eyes! Jana nimekuwa kwa sgr na faiba (my primary mobile data) haikukua so switched to safcom and believe you me sijawahi ona internet struggling hivo viva starlink
 
Last edited:
From M . Hersi twitter post

Dear Mr. Ndegwa & Safaricom team, I hope my message finds you well. I don't know where you were when Mpesa started, but a quick memory flashback will suffice. When MJ became the first CEO of Safaricom and mooted the idea of Mpesa , banks, the top banks were furious. They lobbied and finally had a date with the acting finance minister, then Hon. Francis Michuki, alongside the governor of CBK Njuguna Ndungu.
@CBKKenya
Banks made it clear that a communication company venturing into the world of money without being a bank is a big no-no. While banks approached CBK 17 years ago, Safaricom is today approaching CCK the regulator trying to stop a fellow communication company. The wise men Michuki and Ndungu paid close attention and disregarded the banks' appeal, allowing Mpesa to continue operating. If banks receive the news that Mpesa will disappear today, they will be the first to voice their objections. I saw a letter asking CCK not to license Starlink but to insist they partner with local players. Why does Starlink need a local player to set up shop apart from the unnecessary broker role, which is not required at all? It saddens me greatly that today a firm that benefited from the free market is busy seeking favors that don't exist in law. The Internet is a necessity and no longer a luxury. As a hotelier, we have camps and lodges that struggle with connectivity, and even what we get is hit-and-miss while the cost is insane. In Kenya, there are numerous small towns and schools that lack connectivity. This means that learners and residents of these smaller towns often miss out on the benefits of full connectivity at decent speeds, simply due to their perceived lack of financial resources. Safaricom has no business trying to place obstacles in Starlink's path. Today, Safaricom finds itself in a similar situation to banks, which are attempting to block Mpesa services. Well, what is good for the goose is good for the gander, so please allow Starlink to be. Starlink doesn't require you, Safaricom, or any other player to act as a go-between. This is precisely why Starlink relies on satellite technology, eliminating the need for intermediaries who would only increase the cost. Bw Ndegwa Please wear your creative hat with your team and come up with a counter as opposed to seeking to place hurdles in the path of Starlink. When MJ was asked about Mpesa he said he is not targeting the bank's clientele; he was simply targeting what the banks then described as the unbankable. Those are the clients who could not maintain a minimum bank balance of Ksh30,000. Today, Starlink is also serving the unserved and undeserved in the digital world of connectivity. Well they will also then target Safaricom clients like yours truly here in fact I am using my homefibre to share this message. Instead of trying to stop a river, how about building a dam for a rainy day? Reach out to Starlink to be their partners in Kenya and use your wide network across Kenya to service them. Banks did not insist that Mpesa service go through them but by default that finally happened purely dictated by market demand and not through goverment control or dictates. Please learn to grow the cake to achieve a larger pie, and avoid becoming overly comfortable with a bigger slice of a smaller cake. When you get too comfortable, you get obese don't let Safaricom get too comfortable. Please let Starlink be As always, I choose to remain an optimist. Why Safaricom wants billionaire Musk’s Starlink out of Kenya https://businessdailyafrica.com/bd/markets/market-news/why-safaricom-wants-starlink-out-of-kenya-4736908
 
Safaricom is still fumbling with the entry of competition. I doubt they ever envisaged a worthwhile competitor before 2050, which could explain the lack of a ready strategy. Data must be a key profit center, hence the unwillingness to drop prices.They seem to be confused about what market segment to protect first. By increasing speeds for WiFi users, they believe they are responding. But I doubt speed makes much difference to regular users as long as they can watch videos at a decent resolution.

I would guess their biggest risk lies with heavy users, those spending at least 1000 shillings per month. This is the group they penalize most. It's crazy to imagine that customers can get 1 GB for 10 bob to watch Youtube videos for 1 hour while monthly users have to shell out 1500 bob for 25 GB (60 bob per 1 GB), or 1500 bob for 45 GB at 1.5 GB per day (33 bob per 1 GB).

We could hold lengthy debates about the merits or demerits of the choices Safcom makes, but one thing for certain is that they will have to share their data profits with starlink.
 
upepo said:
Safaricom is still fumbling with the entry of competition. I doubt they ever envisaged a worthwhile competitor before 2050, which could explain the lack of a ready strategy. Data must be a key profit center, hence the unwillingness to drop prices.They seem to be confused about what market segment to protect first. By increasing speeds for WiFi users, they believe they are responding. But I doubt speed makes much difference to regular users as long as they can watch videos at a decent resolution.

I would guess their biggest risk lies with heavy users, those spending at least 1000 shillings per month. This is the group they penalize most. It's crazy to imagine that customers can get 1 GB for 10 bob to watch Youtube videos for 1 hour while monthly users have to shell out 1500 bob for 25 GB (60 bob per 1 GB), or 1500 bob for 45 GB at 1.5 GB per day (33 bob per 1 GB).

We could hold lengthy debates about the merits or demerits of the choices Safcom makes, but one thing for certain is that they will have to share their data profits with starlink.
Click to expand...

I wonder what those engineers with some white double cabins have been doing all this time. Comfort zone ya safaricom has been rattled.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top