strathmore.edu
China juzi wamekataa ku fund coal powered AMU .
Yep, that one was killed with the global focus on clean energy, coal being one of the dirtiest couldn't survive
There is no way China was going to fund a project that was snatched from a Chinese firm in broad daylight. The environmental reasons given are just convenient excuses.
but centum also had another chinku firm backing them
I rember him telling us to use electricity to cook and I thought kichwa yake lazima imeruka.
Hao chinkus wa centum walipata kama 20% stake collectively. The loser was kitu 70% Chinese.
There was some logic in this plea because excess off-peak capacity would find some use. The only issue is that the current tariffs cannot allow such usage. May be they should have started by incentivizing people to use more power by charging less for higher usage instead of doing the opposite.
Those preaching against coal have had their fill. The world is still heavily reliant on coal for cheap electricity. Only fools in third-world countries are buying the green energy narrative. For poor populations, using no coal is more harmful using coal.
there was no logic there, it is like telling people that we have excess fuel please buy this fuel and use it for anything and we will still charge you premium rates for using that fuel unnecessarily
do you know America has over 200 hundred coal fired power stations? what is the problem if we just have atleast two of them for our own benefit?
