in the headlines

[nakujua]

May be I needed to ask: from where are you driving to kitale?

from Nairobi, najua upto eldoret hamna shida, but now the eldoret - kitale road thats where I am not sure

 

[Clemens]

my point of information is if one can get inand out, was it a total lockdown ama mchana people can move in and out, kuuliza tu, sio kwa ubaya mkubwa.

Yes you can, but remember curfew starts at 1900HRS

 

[Ngimanene na Muchere]

this is not in the headline, lakini naomba information, can someone get in and out of Kitale with the covid restrictions that were put in place sometime back on the western region.

Yes, if you're brave and willing to reward the hardworking nice police at the post you can go anywhere, anyhow, anytime

 

[nakujua]

Yes you can, but remember curfew starts at 1900HRS

thanks, kama haukna shida ya mchana the 1900 hrs is well within my timelines.

 

[nakujua]

Yes, if you're brave and willing to reward the hardworking nice police at the post you can go anywhere, anyhow, anytime

does the reward apply outside the changed curfew hours from 1900 hrs to 0400 hrs

 

[Ngimanene na Muchere]

does the reward apply outside the changed curfew hours from 1900 hrs to 0400 hrs

You reward them at the stops

 

[Tiiga Waana]

We are still far from successfully fighting corruption.. seizure of looted funds and property alone cannot fully eradicate corruption..It should be followed by lengthy jail terms.. People will continue to steal as long as they are guaranteed no jail term, I mean what's the worst that can happen if you steal and half of the loot is seized, you still get to the rest of it or you can hide it in offshore account.. so it should be, seize and criminal prosecute.

It is very hard to jail these corrupt people because the seizure of the loot has been done via a civil procedure as opposed to a criminal one.
It is almost impossible to successfully prosecute these cases in a Criminal Court as the standard of prove required (beyond a shadow of doubt) is almost impossible to attain.
Do remember that these thefts were done many years ago and most, if not all, documentary evidence may be missing or destroyed, sometimes deliberately.
It may also be the case that many of those involved are dead or the companies that were paid are no longer trading.
It is therefore difficult to directly connect and link these crooks with the thefts without raising serious doubts and missing jig-saw puzzles.

Civil Courts on the other hand are not as stringent in proving culpability. Their standard of proof is on a balance of probabilities (more likely than not) or what is referred to as preponderance of evidence.
Furthermore Civil Courts can impose a duty of care where a Manager or Financial Officer was negligent when money was stolen or lost.
Civil Courts don’t have powers to give lengthy jail sentences. However what they do is ban such people from exercising a Directorship of a company for a time or for good.

 

[mzeiya]

It is very hard to jail these corrupt people because the seizure of the loot has been done via a civil procedure as opposed to a criminal one.
It is almost impossible to successfully prosecute these cases in a Criminal Court as the standard of prove required (beyond a shadow of doubt) is almost impossible to attain.
Do remember that these thefts were done many years ago and most, if not all, documentary evidence may be missing or destroyed, sometimes deliberately.
It may also be the case that many of those involved are dead or the companies that were paid are no longer trading.
It is therefore difficult to directly connect and link these crooks with the thefts without raising serious doubts and missing jig-saw puzzles.

Civil Courts on the other hand are not as stringent in proving culpability. Their standard of proof is on a balance of probabilities (more likely than not) or what is referred to as preponderance of evidence.
Furthermore Civil Courts can impose a duty of care where a Manager or Financial Officer was negligent when money was stolen or lost.
Civil Courts don’t have powers to give lengthy jail sentences. However what they do is ban such people from exercising a Directorship of a company for a time or for good.

Tuma Paybill ata kama @Field Marshal wouldn't approve

 

[Field Marshal]

It is very hard to jail these corrupt people because the seizure of the loot has been done via a civil procedure as opposed to a criminal one.
It is almost impossible to successfully prosecute these cases in a Criminal Court as the standard of prove required (beyond a shadow of doubt) is almost impossible to attain.
Do remember that these thefts were done many years ago and most, if not all, documentary evidence may be missing or destroyed, sometimes deliberately.
It may also be the case that many of those involved are dead or the companies that were paid are no longer trading.
It is therefore difficult to directly connect and link these crooks with the thefts without raising serious doubts and missing jig-saw puzzles.

Civil Courts on the other hand are not as stringent in proving culpability. Their standard of proof is on a balance of probabilities (more likely than not) or what is referred to as preponderance of evidence.
Furthermore Civil Courts can impose a duty of care where a Manager or Financial Officer was negligent when money was stolen or lost.
Civil Courts don’t have powers to give lengthy jail sentences. However what they do is ban such people from exercising a Directorship of a company for a time or for good.

A gal with brains... Very sexy!