go thee and grab land
- Thread starter wrongturn
- Start date
Field Marshal
Elder Lister
These people are sounding more dangerous by the day.....
Kenya is truly magical. This is the same jambas who claims to have been defrauded twice in land deals. Anything he says I take it as a red flag.
Now, they are even planning to collect an extra 1B of tax magically.
At the same time, they want to tell us one way of cutting budget by 300B is thru creating CAS positions, and increasing state departments to 49
Now, they are even planning to collect an extra 1B of tax magically.
At the same time, they want to tell us one way of cutting budget by 300B is thru creating CAS positions, and increasing state departments to 49
Last edited:
Tiiga Waana
Elder Lister
Just as distinctive and unique as is everybody’s wife, so is personal land.
No two parcels of land are ever the same just as no two wives or partners are ever the same.
Some wives are tall whilst others are short. Some are blooming and bountiful while others, regrettably, are barren.
Some are post-wall whilst others are pre-wall and sweeter than sungush just as some land may be virgin, fallow and very fertile. But all are loved and cherished by the title-holder nevertheless.
What is the point I am belabouring to deliver? - It is the fact that both marriage and land are sacrosanct.
They are also both inviolate. Any interference in one’s land, known as encroachment, or any unfaithfulness in marriage, known as promiscuity, is a desecration recognised and often sanctioned and punished by our laws.
That is the lengths and breadth, the nitty-gritty of land ownership universally.
Unless JSKS intends to introduce a new previously unknown land policy like his ancestor and tribe-mate, Arap Moi, with his “Nyayo Philosophy”, this has been the norm since Hammurabi’s times.
So, the question is, does Hulliam want to get us out of synchronicity with property ownership rules worldwide or is he justifying his grabiosis?
Secondly, his recommendation into how to solve land disputes is not a panacea but a recipe for unnecessary chaos, violence and deaths:
Pray, tell, how do you get an encroacher-grabber and an innocent victim to peacefully sit down and deliberate on how to share equitably the grabber’s loot and pillage?
In this arrangement, whose terms and conditions carry the day?
No two parcels of land are ever the same just as no two wives or partners are ever the same.
Some wives are tall whilst others are short. Some are blooming and bountiful while others, regrettably, are barren.
Some are post-wall whilst others are pre-wall and sweeter than sungush just as some land may be virgin, fallow and very fertile. But all are loved and cherished by the title-holder nevertheless.
What is the point I am belabouring to deliver? - It is the fact that both marriage and land are sacrosanct.
They are also both inviolate. Any interference in one’s land, known as encroachment, or any unfaithfulness in marriage, known as promiscuity, is a desecration recognised and often sanctioned and punished by our laws.
That is the lengths and breadth, the nitty-gritty of land ownership universally.
Unless JSKS intends to introduce a new previously unknown land policy like his ancestor and tribe-mate, Arap Moi, with his “Nyayo Philosophy”, this has been the norm since Hammurabi’s times.
So, the question is, does Hulliam want to get us out of synchronicity with property ownership rules worldwide or is he justifying his grabiosis?
Secondly, his recommendation into how to solve land disputes is not a panacea but a recipe for unnecessary chaos, violence and deaths:
Pray, tell, how do you get an encroacher-grabber and an innocent victim to peacefully sit down and deliberate on how to share equitably the grabber’s loot and pillage?
In this arrangement, whose terms and conditions carry the day?