Search results

Do you know of any country with a strict gag order on all matters sub judice? In the US and UK, the press waits for lawyers virtually outside the courtroom for commentary on the cases before the courts The idea that sub judice automatically translates to a strict gag order is TOTALLY WRONG...

You are VERY wrong on this... It's not a strict gag order... You can give commentary on what you think is happening, and what you think would happen. Also, you can insult the judge outside the courts. Why do you think no one was found in contempt of court? There is actually a very clear...

For the highest court in the land... A court commissioned to guard executive excesses... excesses of men who command the nation's instruments of violence. For the bench of that court to act threatened by tweets from ordinary lawyers isn't very encouraging. How do you guard against a man with...

#Worldle #40 4/6 (100%) 🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜↙️ 🟩🟨⬜⬜⬜↙️ 🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜↙️ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉 https://worldle.teuteuf.fr

How will it be a runoff?

It's a trend observed across central voting patterns. If you understood that Kariri had done so much for these people and still lost to a noob, you'd get the gist. And FYI, if a candidate was to be voted in on performance, then Kariri would be in. Also, if people are just tired of the govt...

:)

Wakubwa nime-surrender kama JUBILEE... Font nimepunguza. @Budspencer @Field Marshal @imei2012 Mumeshinda

The idea that KIAMBAA was a scary outcome for RUTO's Presidential BID is all NONSENSE!!! Here's what people fail, or refuse to understand. Nuggets of truth I'll share are worth more than what you paid for the SATURDAY NATION'S false view that plays loose with obvious facts. Lucky for y'all I...

My friend, the constitution lays bare mechanisms for dealing with rogue judges. If the judges are in any wrong, there is constitutional guidance and precedence. What the constitution does not allow is for one man to play God over the constitution and play things his way. Do you get that? The...

That's not the question we should be asking. The question is what does the constitution say in regards to what is happening (because it's not silent) The President can't cherry pick JSC recommendations. That's a dangerous precedence. What if the CJ decides not to swear in the Auditor General...

Then the pair followed Pa to Manhasset, Where he still held the cash as an asset, But Nan and the man Stole the money and ran, And as for the bucket, Manhasset.

But he followed the pair to Pawtucket, The man and the girl with the bucket; And he said to the man, He was welcome to Nan, But as for the bucket, Pawtucket.

There once was a man from Nantucket Who kept all his cash in a bucket. But his daughter, named Nan, Ran away with a man And as for the bucket, Nantucket.

The playing field can NEVER be even!!! That's just lazy talk. Build your value, because that's what counts. IQ and EQ seem to be excellent markers for success in society. How do you level the playing field there? How do we, for instance, level the playing field between you and the guys who...

Before a popular initiative gets to Wanjiku, it MUST first satisfy constitutional criteria and legal thresholds That is what constitutionalism is... The powers bequeathed upon the Judiciary by Wanjiku gives them the right and duty to play guardian over Wanjikus constitution and keep it from...

It's not the amendment that is illegal, it's the procedure to amend The constitution lays out a clearly defined procedure, the IEBC has clearly defined procedural processes in law and fact. Or do you think the constitution is a list of suggestions? You can't use an unconstitutional process to...

The matters raised are not new. The questions were raised and ignored. You may think it's a political decision, but you're wrong. The reliefs are anchored in precedence and very articulate reasoning. Just look at how the nation doesn't care that the BBI thing has been stopped. No one is...

It's not the judges who rule on the appointment vis the JSC... That's a constitutional thing

Because the 5 are exceeding power vested in them by 50 million people. In your opinion should the court ignore the constitution whenever the executive and other representatives get the endorsement of 3 million people? The executive of Kenya is rogue and very ignorant of constitutional...