TBT Quadro 4K edition

Meria

Elder Lister
Staff member
Our times ukiona gari imeekwa matawi na maua ivi jua kuna sherehe mahali na hata traffic cops hawakuwa nashughuli na nyinyi...I think kitambo heshima ilikua kubwa sana
181260504_4747772641911225_5225692943841371407_n.jpg

siku hizi ukiona gari na matawi jua kuna demo and most probably it has been hijacked by mob na ata watakua kwa roof.
 

Meria

Elder Lister
Staff member
LUNATIC EXPRESS.(Meaning)
More than a hundred years ago, before Europeans had set foot on what is now Kenya, a tribal prophet named Kimnyole spoke of a vicious “iron snake” that would slither its way across the grassy plains, devouring cattle, plundering their lands and wreaking havoc along the way. The beast, he said, would bring a kind of foreigner never seen before, one with strange red hair who would one day rule their land. Although Kimnyole could not have known the details, the prophecy he made was clear on one thing—hardship for his people.
The “iron snake” was the Kenya-Uganda Railway, or the “Lunatic Express,” as the British press liked to call because of the colossal waste of wealth and human life suffered during its construction. The tribes who lived in this region resisted the construction of the railway. Emboldened by their victories against neighboring tribes, the Nandi people went to war against the whites with predictable results. By the time the Nandi gave up arms thousands of them were dead.
While Kimnyole’s prophecies turned out to be true, the “iron snake” did dramatically change the land and the lives of the Nandi people in ways even Kimnyole couldn’t have predicted.
The railway began at a time when European powers were madly scrambling for a piece of Africa. It was the end of the 19th century, and many European colonists had established small trading posts along the coast, but only a few had ventured into the hostile interior. The British were present mainly in Egypt, South Africa and East Africa—a vast region on the east coast which would later break into as many as twenty nations. The French occupied West Africa, and from there they were slowly pushing into the African interior, with the eventual goal of creating an empire spanning east to west. The British sought to block the advances of the French colonists by building a railway connecting the port of Mombasa to the east coast of Lake Victoria, the source of the Nile, eventually controlling the Nile itself. The river, which cut through the continent from south to north, would effectively prevent any competing nation from establishing an east-west empire. Besides, controlling the Nile had a big commercial advantage
In December 1895, George Whitehouse, the British engineer tasked to build the Kenya-Uganda Railway, sailed into Mombasa harbor with only a sketch of the route the railway was supposed to take. The epic line would stretch for a thousand kilometers, and would be one of the biggest engineering project of the time undertaken by the British. Whitehouse discovered that not only the project would be extremely costly, the work would be physically grueling as well. Directly west of Mombasa lay a vast waterless region that most caravans avoided. Beyond, the railway would pass through 500 km of savanna and scrub that teemed with lions and swarmed with mosquitoes. Then came the volcanic highland region split by a 80-km-wide Great Rift Valley that plunged 2,000 foot from the plains. The final 150 km to the lake’s shore was a soggy marshland.
Construction of the railway began at Mombasa, in 1896, and the line progressed towards its terminus on the eastern shore of Lake Victoria. Over the next five years, huge amount of materials arrived at the harbor in Mombasa—200,000 pieces of rails, 1.2 million sleepers, 200,000 fish-plates, 400,000 fish-bolts and 4.8 million steel keys and steel girders. In addition, locomotives, tenders, brake vans, goods wagons, and passenger carriages had to be brought in. Warehouses were constructed, accommodation for the workers built, repair shops and workshops opened. The sleepy coastal town of Mombasa was rapidly transformed into a modern port.
Nearly all the workers involved on the construction of the line came from British India. The prospect of regular salary, free food and free travel lured some 37,000 laborers and skilled artisans to sign up for the job. Within the first year, half the workforce was immobilized by malaria, dysentery, and other tropical diseases. The heat crippled and dust storms gagged the workers. Conditions were so unforgiving that author M. F. Hill remarked in his official history of the railway, that “as if the very spirit of Africa resented the intrusion of the white man’s railway.”
One of the grisliest chapters in the construction of the railway occurred in 1898 during the building of a bridge across the Tsavo River. A pair of man-eating lions stalked the campsite, dragging away workers while they slept in their tents at night. The attack continued for ten months, during which more than a hundred victims, allegedly, were claimed. Hundreds of workers fled from Tsavo, and the construction came almost to a halt. The lions were killed eventually after days of careful stalking and baiting.
Some 2,500 workers died during the construction of the railway—four for each mile of track laid. About 6,700 decided to stay behind, creating the first community of Indians in Kenya. The rest returned home.
The initial cost for the construction of the railway was pegged at $5 million, but it cost the British $9 million to build, creating much resentment in the parliament and the media. Even before construction started, there were many who opposed the idea. One opponent, Henry Labouchère, a member of the parliament, gave a mocking reply to British Foreign Minister George Curzon's support for the project, in the form of a now famous poem:
What it will cost no words can express,
What is its object no brain can suppose,
Where it will start from no one can guess,
Where it is going to nobody knows,
What is the use of it none can conjecture,
What it will carry there’s none can define,
And in spite of George Curzon’s superior lecture,
It clearly is naught but a lunatic line.
lunatic express uganda railway
It was the first time the word “lunatic” was used to describe the railway—a word that would frequently be associated with the line. The term “Lunatic Express” came much later, coined by Charles Miller in his 1971 book The Lunatic Express: An Entertainment in Imperialism.
Yet, others called it “the most courageous railway in the world.” Winston Churchill described the construction of the Lunatic Line as “one of the finest expositions of the British art of muddling through.”
Over the next one hundred years, the railway played a vital role in the development of the region, opening up the East African interior, and connecting it to the coast. Before the railway, Nairobi was an uninhabited swamp. Here, Whitehouse decided to build a half-way house with a store depot and a shunting ground. Today, Nairobi is the largest city of Kenya with a population of over 3 million.
Charles Eliot, commissioner of British East Africa between 1900 and 1904, remarked: “It is not uncommon for a country to create a railway, but it is uncommon for a railway to create a country.”
The railway continued to operate for 116 years, until 2017, when the last meter-gauge train made its run between Mombasa and Nairobi. The route is now taken over by a faster rail service whose lines run parallel to the original Uganda Railway.The word Lunatic is coined from two words Luna and tic..luna is a latin word for moon so the word Lunatic is temporary insanity.True to the word it was a temporary insanity which cost many lives,labour and economic resources just to safeguard the English interests from the German and the French for control that was unnecessary and never was viable Umeelewa sasa...The second Lunacy has been seen as chinese are at it giving us loans,left,right,center...And historia inajirudia
🤔
🤔
🤔


180468898_4742381265783696_6717119816667559663_n.jpg
180560949_4742381499117006_1529644376593062847_n.jpg
180970498_4742381852450304_3224912325526753301_n.jpg
180421669_4742382185783604_646291806834088906_n.jpg
180668783_4742382545783568_7795218572687339759_n.jpg
180707077_4742382765783546_5813123942659147681_n.jpg
180816002_4742383065783516_5116069062876641766_n.jpg
180510286_4742383612450128_4767190093233072435_n.jpg
180287033_4742383795783443_2225864731439609636_n.jpg
181382025_4742384299116726_4539502792372993838_n.jpg
 

It's Me Scumbag

Elder Lister
MUMA(the oath taking of 1969)
The Kenyatta oath that shook Kenya.
Founding President Mzee Jomo Kenyatta
On the morning of June 9, 1969, the Rev John Gatu, now a retired moderator of the Presbyterian Church of East Africa (PCEA), received a rather unusual call from the Ichaweri home of founding President Mzee Jomo Kenyatta.
The caller on the other end of the line informed him that the President wanted to see him but did not divulge details.
Moments later, the moderator at the time the Rev Crispus Kiongo, called Gatu on the telephone, informing him that he too had been summoned to the home in Gatundu. A day earlier, Gatu had made a powerful sermon against voter bribery in the upcoming General Election, a planned gratuity for Cabinet ministers and a host of other national matters. He was worried that he could have annoyed the President.
When the two men of the cloth arrived in Ichaweri, they found the President flanked by Mbiyu Koinange, then the Minister of State in the Office of the President.
“To our great surprise and horror, the visit had nothing to do with my sermon,” Gatu writes in his newly-published memoir, Fan Into Flame. “It was summons in disguise. We were expected to take a Gikuyu oath, which was being administered to “all Gikuyu of goodwill”, ostensibly to solidify the unity of the tribe
Orchestrated by Kenyatta’s inner circle, the ceremonies were meant to mobilise Gema communities against Jaramogi Oginga Odinga’s Kenya People’s Union ahead of upcoming elections whose date was, however, yet to be set.
Stunned, the two men listened silently as Kenyatta explained that some of the oath’s repulsive requirements would be set aside because of their faith if they so wished. For instance, they would be allowed to swap blood for milk. Their requests for the full text of the oath would be denied, the President only telling them that it was secret.
There was no mistaking, however, that the message came with a veiled threat: Turning down the order would be seen as betrayal by a church that had strong roots and great influence across his Central Kenya political base.
“Of all the things and of all the places, this was the last thing we expected to come from the lips of one we had come to love so dearly, our President,” Gatu recalls. The two men then silently left, informing the President that they would communicate their decision at a later date.
The short meeting marked the beginning of a nightmare that would last several months and in which Gatu’s wife and children would be kidnapped by State agents and forced to take the oath.
In the book, Gatu for the first time reveals stunning details on the infamous mass oath ceremonies in Gatundu, including reports that scores of people were illegally detained at Kenyatta’s home in Ichaweri and forced to undergo the gross ritual.
The book paints the picture of a mobilisation process that spread turmoil in Kenyatta’s Mt Kenya bedrock with reports of extortion, kidnappings and cold-blooded killings of those who defied.
Details would emerge that those forced to take the oath were asked to vow that they would never allow the presidency to leave the ‘House of Mumbi”.
The killing of Thomas Joseph Mboya, a man whose appeal spread across communities, happened at the height of the oathing ceremonies, further widening divisions between the Kikuyu and the Luo.
Gatu reveals the genesis of the deep-rooted divisions between the two communities that are still playing out as the 2017 election approaches, this time pitting Oginga Odinga’s son CORD leader Raila Odinga and Jomo Kenyatta’s son, President Uhuru Kenyatta.
Gatu recalls that after the shooting, there was widespread suspicion that the assassination was instigated by the State, sparking bitterness and anger against Kikuyus. During Mboya’s requiem mass, a woman allegedly threw a shoe at Kenyatta.
“In addition, the President’s car was stoned. His security detail responded, resulting in many casualties and fatalities, most of them from the Luo community. This marked the beginning of a deep-rooted bitterness against the Gikuyu by the Luo community,” Gatu writes.
President Kenyatta’s succession was also at play with his bosom friends keen on ensuring that Daniel arap Moi, then the vice president, would not succeed Mzee.
Gitu writes that after consulting other church leaders, it was decided that they would not take the oath as it served no purpose in a newly independent Kenya. The churchmen promptly delivered a letter to Kenyatta explaining their position.
Then, all hell broke loose.
One day, after escorting Gatu to the airport to catch a flight to Beirut, Lebanon, his wife Rahabu and their children were waylaid by a crowd and forced to take the oath. State agents increasingly targeted PCEA clergy, leaving church leaders to conclude they were being punished for defying Kenyatta.
“Rahabu waited until I returned from Lebanon to tell me about her ordeal. Until the time she passed on, nearly 40 years later, she never spoke about the oathing incident again. She must have been totally traumatised.”
Thousands of people continued flocking Gatundu to take the oath, the State marshalling huge resources for the rather unorthodox method of rallying Central Kenya residents to Kenyatta’s side. State agents orchestrated kidnappings and torture.
Gatu recalls one disturbing case in which a Reverend Stephen Mwangi Cauri and his wife were forced to take Chai, euphemism for the oath.
“He revealed that his wife was first seized by the President’s escort police at Kiambu where she worked as a nurse. She was then taken to Kwamaiko near Kambui where he was picked just as he wound up a church function,” Gatu writes. “They were first driven to Ruiru, then to Gatundu where they were forced to take the Chai.”
The government, in the meantime, continued to deny that the ceremonies were taking place, with Koinange issuing a ministerial statement in Parliament in which he said the allegations were false.
On July 22, 1969, the PCEA clergy wrote to the President, telling him among other things that the ceremonies were isolating Kikuyus from other communities.
“Gikuyu as a tribe cannot keep from other tribes. This will result in the remaining tribes forming their block against the Kikuyu and aggravating the current harangues against the tribe,” they wrote. Still, the President would not listen.
When the ceremonies persisted, forcing women to flee their homes and children to drop from school, they wrote yet another letter in which they explained the oathing had caused serious damage to the social fabric in Central Kenya.
“There is more evidence of people being held hostage at Your Excellency’s home at Gatundu in your absence. There are many other centres where similar instances have been reported, where people have been beaten up, thrown out of buildings, naked, to suffer the cold of the night after beatings that have driven them unconscious,” they told the President in a letter dated September 15, 1969.
They told Kenyatta that children whose parents had not taken the oath had been thrown out of school, teachers seized from schools, and men of the cloth kidnapped and forced to take Chai.
“There is evidence of a number of people who have died as a result of the shock received after passing through the experience.”
Details of the full text of the oath remained scanty. However, the church established that residents were being asked to denounce family planning, a measure probably designed to increase the community’s population and vote. The community was also being urged to circumcise its daughters.
Gatu writes: “One thing was clear, there was a lot being said about defending the flag ‘against the uncircumcised’, in this case the Luo, and the solidarity of the Gikuyu tribe to combat any physical attack against them, which was being implied as imminent.”
Echoes of these sentiments eerily remain today, with Kikuyu politicians using the circumcision claim to campaign against Raila.
There was also evidence that blood played a key role in the ceremonies.
For instance, one man identified as Samuel Gathinji Mwai was kidnapped from his home together with his wife on the night of September 15, 1969. He died two days later from injuries inflicted by the oathing gang.
His wife would later tell The East African Standard: “We were told we must take the oath and defend the flag from leaving the House of Mumbi. (The man) then asked us to drink blood from a spoon...”
The church would later organise massive prayer rallies in which pastors led their congregations in denouncing the oath. Signs that the government was softening its stand came when Eliud Mathu, then the State House Comptroller, raised his hand in support of the denunciation during a prayer rally attended by about 25,000 people in Kikuyu.
On September 16, Moi issued a statement in which he asked police to probe claims of widespread brutality. Still, Kenyatta was furious, summoning the clergy to explain why they were holding rallies and tainting the government’s image.
“For Kenyatta, the rallies were a show of strength, the church versus the State” Gatu writes. The clergy, however, prepared well for the meeting and put together photos of victims of torture and other evidence.
After a long meeting in which Kenyatta was visibly furious, he appeared to soften his stand and said: “To talk openly is to love each other...” he said, much to the surprise of the gathered clergymen. “You are free to come and see me any time you feel there is need but let us not do our nation building through the press.”
The oathing period was coming to an end. It effects, however, continue to be felt today,from that the leadership was in pariah

View attachment 41382
You might do well if you edited your post to indicate that John Gatu is now deceased. Died in '97.
 

Mwalimu-G

Elder Lister
June 12, 2020

Difference Between Armadillo And Pangolin

Armadillos are easily mistaken for pangolins, because both of them have a protective shell on the surface of their body. They are often grouped together with anteaters because of their behavior and similarities in their diet. But there are significant differences between the two mammals in terms of physical characteristics, habitat, taxonomy, behavior and reproduction.


What is Armadillo?
Armadillos are one of a kind mammal in the order Cingulata which is part of the superorder Xenarthra. There are almost 20 living species of armadillo that belong to the order, of which the nine-branded armadillo is the only kind that lives in North America. The nine-branded armadillo is very distinctive and received its name from the bands that circle its body. Its name in Spanish means “little armored one,” which refers to the bony plates that cover most of their body. Armadillos are found in South America, Central America, and the southern United States.



What is Pangolin?
Pangolins are scaly anteaters of the placental mammal order Pholidota, and represent one of the most unusual orders of mammals. Pangolins are often mistaken as reptiles, but they are scaly-skinned animals that posses a covering of epidermal scales growing from a thick underlying skin, which distinguish pangolins from all other mammals. Pangolins lack teeth and instead they use powerful muscles and small pebbles in their stomach to grind up their food. Pangolins are found in much of Southeast Asia and subtropical Africa.

1628780203502.png

Difference Between Armadillo and Pangolin
Family of Armadillo and Pangolin
– Armadillos are strange looking mammals in the order Cingulata which is part of the superorder Xenarthra – an ancient order that was much more diverse and included ground sloths and armored mammals. There are almost 20 living species of armadillo that belong to the order. Armadillos belong to the family Dasypodidae. Pangolins, on the other hand, are often known as the scaly anteaters and comprise the placental mammal order Pholidota of the Manidae family. Pangolins represent one of the most unusual orders of mammals.
Morphology
– Armadillos are one its kind with a protective shell on their body and long sharp claws for digging. The outer shell is called a carapace which is brown and tough like armor. The integument is one of the most characteristic features of the anatomy of the armadillos. Its name in Spanish means “little armored one,” which refers to the bony plates that cover most of their body. Pangolins are characterized by their name “scaly anteater” and their most distinctive feature is an external armor of overlapping epidermal scales. They are the only mammals to possess such armor that grows from their thick underlying skin.

Physical Features of Armadillo and Pangolin
– Armadillos are generally larger than pangolins and have long tails and short limbs. They have tiny, pointed eyes and long, tube-shaped snouts. Armadillos generally weight between nine and 16 pounds and the average armadillo is about 75 cm long, including tail. The giant armadillo grows up to 150 cm. They vary in size and color – the giant armadillo is dark brown while the pink fairy armadillo is a lovely salmon color. Pangolins weight about 3.5 lbs to 73 lbs and they can grow up to four feet long. The giant ground pangolin is the largest of their living species. Pangolins lack teeth and instead use powerful muscles and small pebbles in their stomach to grind up their food.
Habitat and Diet of Armadillo and Pangolin
– Armadillos live mostly in warm places, including rain forests, grasslands, semi-deserts, and other forested areas. Some live in areas with moist soil, close to rivers or streams. They live in South America, Central America, and the southern United States. The nine-branded armadillos are probably the only armadillos to live outside of Latin America. In fact, the nine-branded armadillo it is the sole North American representative of the order Xenarthra. They eat ants, beetles, termites, and other insects.

Pangolins inhabit sandy habitats such as dry woodlands, tropical forests and the savannah. They live close to water sources. Pangolins are dispersed throughout Southern, Central and East Africa. There are four species that spread across Asia: the Indian Pangolin, the Chinese Pangolin, the Sunda Pangolin, and the Palawan Pangolin. Four African Pangolins include the ground pangolin, the giant pangolin, the white-bellied, and the black-bellied pangolin. Pangolins rely mainly on the diet of ants and termites.
Reproduction
– Armadillos mate in late summer between June and September. The female armadillo undergoes delayed implantation, meaning the fertilized egg (zygote) floats free in the uterus prior to implanting. This delay is typically for three to four months, although a two-year delay in exceptional cases has been documented. The fertilized egg breaks into four identical zygotes, giving birth to quadruplets. Pangolins, on the other hand, are solitary and it is assumed that males and females only come together to mate. The mating happens once each year, usually during the summer or autumn. During copulation, the tails of the males and females are entwined. Gestation period is estimated to be 140 days and females give birth to just one live baby.

Armadillo vs. Pangolin: Comparison Chart


1628780203861.png

Summary of Armadillo and Pangolin
Armadillos are some of the world’s most bizarre animals along with anteaters and sloths, and together they make up the superorder Xenarthra. These are shy, nocturnal animals that live in warm places with a lot of rainfall. They prefer living in wooded areas with loose, sandy soil, often close to ponds or streams. There are many species of Armadillos, of which the nine-branded armadillo is the only kind that lives in North America. Pangolins, on the other hand, are scaly anteaters that represent one of the most unusual orders of mammals and their most noteworthy feature is an external armor of overlapping epidermal scales. In fact, they are the only mammals to possess such armor. Pangolins are found in much of Southeast Asia and subtropical Africa, and they predominantly feed on ants and termites, just like armadillos
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Top