Politics and Other Biases Aside, what’s your objective opinion on this?

upepo

Elder Lister
Daniel Moi-era diplomat loses claim to 2,500-acre Naivasha land
Tuesday August 15 2023
DnWestMoi1507yg


A Moi-era diplomat and PS Benjamin Kipkech Kipkulei. FILE PHOTO | NMG

By BRIAN WASUNA

A Moi-era diplomat and Permanent Secretary Benjamin Kipkech Kipkulei has lost a 2,500-acre parcel in Naivasha estimated to be worth billions of shillings following a court ruling that may have left the prime property’s ownership in limbo.
Mr Kipkulei had sued Ndibithi Farmers Company Ltd and three of its officials – Edward Maina, Jane Maina and Moses Gakinya – in 2021 claiming ownership of the land and sought compensation for the group’s alleged destruction and trespass on the property.
Ndibithi Farmers Company Ltd filed a counterclaim, arguing that it has always been the registered owner of the land and that Mr Kipkulei obtained ownership documents through fraud. Naivasha High Court judge Lynette Omollo has dismissed both Mr Kipkulei’s suit and the counterclaim by Nbibithi Farmers Company Ltd, a move that now creates mystery over the property’s ownership.
Mr Kipkulei claimed to have purchased the land in 2007 from various individuals who were allotted the property by the Agricultural Development Corporation (ADC).

He did not, however, file any evidence of sale agreements or payment for the land in court. During the hearing, Mr Kipkulei said he did due diligence on the property but could not confirm if the process indicated that the people he paid were listed as the registered owners.The former PS said he bought six subdivided pieces of land but did not know their total acreage.Ndibithi Farmers Company Ltd insisted that the land has never belonged to the ADC, and was originally owned by Lord Gilbert Preville Colville, a British settler.Mr Maina, Ms Maina and Mr Gakinya argued that Lord Colville asked his workers to form a company through which he could gift them the 2,500 acres. They argued that Ndibithi Farmers Company received a title deed for the land in 1974.Justice Omollo said that neither party had given sufficient evidence to prove ownership.

[email protected]
 

Tiiga Waana

Elder Lister
Hapa itakuwa noma sana. He bought the land? Yes, but from someone who could not prove ownership of the land.
Well said.
Nemo dat quod non habet is a legal principle that states that “the purchase of a possession from Someone who has no title (ownership right), denies the Purchaser any ownership title.

The reasoning behind this principle is the common sense logic that one cannot transfer, give or pass on more rights than they have.
 

Tiiga Waana

Elder Lister
I think Ruto is losing the hoi polloi everyday as they come to the shocking though belated realisation that he is indeed a thief and an unapologetic criminal out to enrich himself at their expense.
 
Top