Kisangani's
New Lister
Allow me dream in peace please.
1. Breaking open the topic
When the people below are rich, the ruler at the top will naturally be rich.
2.Receiving the topic
This is so because the wealth of the ruler is something kept by the people. If the people are already rich, how can it stand to reason that the ruler alone is poor?
3.Beginning the discussion
Dear Raila/Ruto:
As you stand before us and speak from great depth of insight or knowledge the idea of the oneness of the ruler and the people; as you solicit for my vote remember the implication of your proposals is to increase the taxation on the 'rich' due to the insufficiency of revenues for state expenditure to fund your campaign promises; to insure the sufficiency of state expenditure, then, what could take precedence over measures to insure sufficiency for the people?
4.merging into the discussion
If, indeed,
Our incomes were taxed with the sincere wish to be thrifty in expenditure and to be considerate in showing love to the people, that
the taxes on the agricultural produce were levied with no scheme to exploit the people and to seek extravagance for the person of the ruler himself;
Then,
the exertions of the people would not be burdened with excessive taxations, the accumulation of the people's property would not be exhausted by undue demands;
within common households there would be enough savings and accumulation, leaving little worry over caring for parents and raising the young,
in the ordinary farms there would be abundant food, and in humble households sufficient savings to ward off the anxieties of nurturing the living and of honoring the dead.
5.Middle legs
If the people are enjoying sufficiency, for what conceivable reason should the ruler be left alone in poverty?
6.Later legs
I know that
what is kept in the common households would all be available to the ruler, without its being hoarded in the treasury to enable the ruler to claim, "This is my wealth";
what is stored in the farm and fields would all be accessible to the ruler, without its being accumulated in the vaults to enable the ruler to claim, "These are my possessions."
With inexhaustible availability, what worry is there for failure to respond to demand?
With inexhaustible supplies, what anxiety is there for lack of preparedness in emergency?
7:Closing legs
Tithes and offerings will be in plenty for the lords dwellings no one will bother you again. and our natural resources abundant to be used as tributes and diplomatic gifts. Even if these were insufficient, the people will naturally supply them in full. Wherein will there be a shortage?
Food and delicacies, beefs and drinks will be abundant for entertainment of state guests and our elected representatives; well nourished and able bodied youth will be supplied for the army and policing, arms and equipment will be enough for the preparation of wars and defense. Even if these were insufficient, the people will take care of the needs. Wherein again will there be insufficiency?
8.Conclusion
Oh! If only taxation was for the good of the people, and not easy plunder for a few misguided, and its usage for the sufficiency of national expenditure. Where then is there any need to increase taxation to attain national wealth?
1. Breaking open the topic
When the people below are rich, the ruler at the top will naturally be rich.
2.Receiving the topic
This is so because the wealth of the ruler is something kept by the people. If the people are already rich, how can it stand to reason that the ruler alone is poor?
3.Beginning the discussion
Dear Raila/Ruto:
As you stand before us and speak from great depth of insight or knowledge the idea of the oneness of the ruler and the people; as you solicit for my vote remember the implication of your proposals is to increase the taxation on the 'rich' due to the insufficiency of revenues for state expenditure to fund your campaign promises; to insure the sufficiency of state expenditure, then, what could take precedence over measures to insure sufficiency for the people?
4.merging into the discussion
If, indeed,
Our incomes were taxed with the sincere wish to be thrifty in expenditure and to be considerate in showing love to the people, that
the taxes on the agricultural produce were levied with no scheme to exploit the people and to seek extravagance for the person of the ruler himself;
Then,
the exertions of the people would not be burdened with excessive taxations, the accumulation of the people's property would not be exhausted by undue demands;
within common households there would be enough savings and accumulation, leaving little worry over caring for parents and raising the young,
in the ordinary farms there would be abundant food, and in humble households sufficient savings to ward off the anxieties of nurturing the living and of honoring the dead.
5.Middle legs
If the people are enjoying sufficiency, for what conceivable reason should the ruler be left alone in poverty?
6.Later legs
I know that
what is kept in the common households would all be available to the ruler, without its being hoarded in the treasury to enable the ruler to claim, "This is my wealth";
what is stored in the farm and fields would all be accessible to the ruler, without its being accumulated in the vaults to enable the ruler to claim, "These are my possessions."
With inexhaustible availability, what worry is there for failure to respond to demand?
With inexhaustible supplies, what anxiety is there for lack of preparedness in emergency?
7:Closing legs
Tithes and offerings will be in plenty for the lords dwellings no one will bother you again. and our natural resources abundant to be used as tributes and diplomatic gifts. Even if these were insufficient, the people will naturally supply them in full. Wherein will there be a shortage?
Food and delicacies, beefs and drinks will be abundant for entertainment of state guests and our elected representatives; well nourished and able bodied youth will be supplied for the army and policing, arms and equipment will be enough for the preparation of wars and defense. Even if these were insufficient, the people will take care of the needs. Wherein again will there be insufficiency?
8.Conclusion
Oh! If only taxation was for the good of the people, and not easy plunder for a few misguided, and its usage for the sufficiency of national expenditure. Where then is there any need to increase taxation to attain national wealth?
