This is why i ask for a person's definition so I dont strawman your argument.
First of all, what does the plumbing have to with raising a family? If a single parents can do a the job of raising a family without "half of the natural plumbing missing" why cant a homosexual couple do the same?
Plumbing has everything to do with raising a family. The plumbing comes with the necessary hormonal equipment that makes women the better caregivers and men the natural providers. Single parents may live in that house with the children, but those children are not raised in isolation. It takes the effort of immediate family, neighbours and in some cases, the society, to raise those children collectively. This is why with most families when one parent dies, the family left behind tends to not do so well.
Now I ask you, do you think Africans will take kindly to children raised by homosexuals? Why would you want to subject innocent children to that despicable situation?
f propagating the society is the only way a relationship can be deemed natural, what of heterosexual couples that are unable to conceive? By your definition they are Automatically unnatural..
Hapa naona fallacies aplenty.
Normal couples who are not able to conceive have a
naturally occurring problem with their plumbing that may require some medical intervention to solve. If not for that problem, everything would have gone smoothly.
Homosexuals, on the other hand, have a
problem of their own creation. Whether you like it or not, they require someone of the opposite sex to provide them with a child. Lesbians still need a man's sperm to conceive. Help me understand how you reached the conclusion that heterosexual couples who can't have kids are unnatural.
There is a difference between the two bolded phrases. How does a naturally occurring problem now mean that normal couples who can't conceive are now unnatural?
while it may be true that societies dont grow on vibes, greek civilization is (in)famously known for having homosexual behavior thrive within its ranks. I will have to check to cite, but im recall reading of some other societies that have had homosexuality tendancies within it and gotten along just fine.
Allow me to remind you,
we are Africans. What the Greeks did with their arseholes should not be of any matter or consequence to us, or mean that is the direction we should be taking. If anything it should be a warning. Greek civilization died a painful death while the various African societies were able to weather the vagaries of time until the coloniser came to steal, kill and destroy.
One would think that anal sex only occurs between gay people from this statement or the risks are inapplicable to heterosexual couple. The point is moot in this regard.
Now you are just reaching for straws. That was a general statement but now that you've given it a direction, I can pose this. What percentage of gay couples engage in anal sex in comparison to heterosexual couples? Even without the help of a calculator, wouldn't it be the gays who will suffer more in comparison to normal couples?